Legal Opinion

Carney v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided October 12, 2000No. 03-99-00401-CRPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN F. ONION, Jr., Justice (Retired).

This appeal is taken from a conviction for interference with the duties of a peace officer. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 38.15 (West Supp.2000). The jury, having found appellant David George Carney guilty, assessed his punishment at 180 days in the county jail and a fine of $2000, the maximum punishment for a Class B misdemeanor. See Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 12.22 (West 1994).

Points of Error

Appellant advances six points of error. First, appellant challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. We sustain this challenge and find it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Saxton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Freeman v. GoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  2. Constance Westfall v. Jose LunaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  3. Monica Voss v. Gregory GoodeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  4. Randy Childers v. Ed IglesiasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
  5. Pedro Antonio Segovia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API