Legal Opinion

Devins v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*582Respondent’s determination that petitioner was chronically delinquent in payment of rent was supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Purdy v Kreisberg, 47 NY2d 354, 358 [1979]), including a Housing Court Stipulation dated January 28, 2008, in which petitioner agreed to pay $3,506.55 in arrears; testimony from her housing development’s assistant manager, expressly credited by the hearing officer (see Matter of Porter v New York City Hous. Auth., 42 AD3d 314, 314 [2007]), that petitioner had not paid rent since August 2007 and, by April 2009, owed over $11,000 in rent arrears; and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Purdy v. KreisbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Porter v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Morman v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Moore v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Moore v. RheaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Rivera v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. Rivera v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API