Legal Opinion

Racioppa v. Hanson

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.

This is a motion to quash a subpoena duces tecum served by the defendant-respondent on the plaintiff-petitioner’s hospital. Plaintiff is in the process of being examined before trial in his personal injury action. The respondent says that his testimony as to his injuries is so fantastic as to be incredible and that the hospital records are to be used solely for the purpose of refreshing his recollection. The plaintiff says that the records should not be produced because the hospital is not a party, is not even a witness sought to be examined, and that they are confidential communications.

Were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rubel Corp. v. RosoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Rubin v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Revyuk v. DunbarNew York Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API