Goldfarb v. C. & K. Purchasing Corp.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
1Per curiam
The rule is well settled that the rights of an assignee are superior to those of a creditor of the assignor who attaches after the assignment of an indebtedness originally due the assignor. The only effect of the failure to notify the debtor of the assignment is to protect him as to any payments which he might *91make to the assignor or to an attaching creditor of the assignor in good faith and in ignorance of the assignment. (Greentree v. Rosenstock, 61 N. Y. 583, 593; Williams v. Ingersoll, 89 id. 508, 523; 2 Williston on Contracts [Rev. ed.], § 434; Restatement of the Law of Contracts, § 172,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Williams v. . IngersollNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Fish v. . VanderlipNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Greentree v. . RosenstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Cipperly v. LinkNew York Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by5 opinions
- Willsey v. StrawwayNew York Supreme Court · 1963
- Rochester Co-operative Milk Producers Bargaining Agency, Inc. v. Du MondNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- County National Bank v. Inter-County Farmers Cooperative Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Eljam Mason Supply, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund American InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Metropolitan Savings & Loan Ass'nCivil Court of the City of New York · 1965