Legal Opinion
People v. Grant
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1992No. F016115PublishedCited by 9 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOFFAT, J. *
Defendant, William Francis Grant, appeals following his sexual battery conviction. (Pen. Code, § 243.4, subd. (a).) He claims his conviction was not supported by substantial evidence, he was erroneously required to register pursuant to Penal Code section 290, and the imposition of restitution fines exceeded the terms of his plea bargain. In the published portion of our opinion, in determining whether substantial evidence supports the conviction, we discuss the meaning of “unlawful restraint” as an element of a sexual battery.
Statement of the Case
On February 21, 1991, a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. PahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- State v. SchenckSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- People v. HaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. AlfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. David Lopez-MontanezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. FernandezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- People v. DixonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- United States v. Gonzalez-JaquezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- People v. RosenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.