Legal Opinion

Sands v. Reimers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 17, 1995No. 93-56250UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

50 F.3d 16

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Robert L. SANDS, and, d/b/a Sands and Associates, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Stephen D. REIMERS, an individual; and d/b/a Hyperbaric

Therapy, Inc., and d/b/a Reimers Engineering,

Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-56250.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 9, 1995.*

Decided March 17, 1995.

Before: BROWNING,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. Flynt Distributing Company, Inc. v. Leon Harvey, Alfred HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Thos. P. Gonzalez Corporation v. Consejo Nacional De Produccion De Costa Rica, and Sergio Quiros MarotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Associated Vendors, Inc. v. Oakland Meat Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Paccar International, Inc. v. Commercial Bank of Kuwait, S.A.K.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jerry Cox v. Mariposa CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API