Legal Opinion

State v. Farnum

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided August 30, 1996No. 95-0893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HABHAB, Judge.

Defendant Christopher Famum was convicted of third-degree sexual abuse in violation of Iowa Code section 709.4 (1993). On appeal he argues: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; 2) the trial court erred in allowing witnesses to testify about whether an assault had occurred, the elements of the offense, and the credibility of the victim; and 3) his trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm.

I. Sufficiency of the Evidence. Defendant argues there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of third-degree sexual abuse. He asserts the victim’s testimony…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  4. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
  5. State v. RinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  2. Molina v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  3. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
  4. Molina v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  5. Molina v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API