State v. Farnum
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
HABHAB, Judge.
Defendant Christopher Famum was convicted of third-degree sexual abuse in violation of Iowa Code section 709.4 (1993). On appeal he argues: 1) there was insufficient evidence to support the conviction; 2) the trial court erred in allowing witnesses to testify about whether an assault had occurred, the elements of the offense, and the credibility of the victim; and 3) his trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm.
I. Sufficiency of the Evidence. Defendant argues there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction of third-degree sexual abuse. He asserts the victim’s testimony…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. SullivanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
- State v. RinehartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Molina v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Iowa · 2003
- Molina v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
- Molina v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.