Harbaugh v. Myron Harbaugh Motor, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partShepard, Chief Justice
I concur in the majority opinion to the extent that it determines to reverse and remand this cause on the basis that issues of material fact remain for determination on appellants’ second claim relating to the existence of contracts for the sale and conveyance of Harbaugh Motor Company. As to that portion of the majority opinion which relates to the claim of appellants based on the guardianship, I dissent.
I.C. § 15-5-210 provides in pertinent part, “A guardian’s authority and responsibility terminates * * * upon the minor’s * * * attainment of majority
*299As pointed out in the majority opinion,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Courson v. TollisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Shepherd v. DouganIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
- Bagwell v. HintonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
- Olympia Mining & Milling Co. v. KernsIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
- Chapin v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.