Legal Opinion

State v. Mildenhall

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1987No. 860366PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

In this consolidated appeal, we treat two separate criminal cases against defendant. In the first case, defendant claims the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to withdraw his plea of guilty to forcible sex abuse. In the second case, a jury found defendant guilty of sodomy on a child. Defendant claims four errors in the second trial. He alleges that the trial court (1) improperly admitted evidence of his guilty plea in the first case, thus depriving him of a fair trial, (2) erred in denying his motion for a new trial based on the State’s alleged failure…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PetreeUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. GrayUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. State v. MillerUtah Supreme Court · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. HoffUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. VasilacopulosCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  3. State v. BlairUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API