Legal Opinion

King v. State

New York Court of Claims

Decided May 15, 1922No. Claim No. 16999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Claim for injuries sustained on highway.

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

At about five o’clock in the afternoon of November 7, 1920, the claimant was a passenger in an automobile driven by one Ruth Jensen, east on county highway No. 924-B in Erie county, across Stony Brook bridge to a point about five miles beyond the bridge. About six o’clock of the same day they returned over the same road. The Stony Brook bridge was at the foot of a hill, the road descending to it from the east at a grade of seven and ninety-one one-hundredths per cent. Just west of the bridge the road curved south. On the north side of the road about fifty feet west of the bridge stood a guard…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Flanagan v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  3. Borden v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1920
  4. Flanagan v. . New York Central and Hudson River Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armstrong v. BacherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API