Legal Opinion

Boykin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 3, 1993No. 92-3236PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOANOS, Chief Judge.

Appellant, John D. Boykin, II, appeals an amended order of restitution. He contends the imposition of restitution was improper, because the trial court lost jurisdiction to order restitution. We agree, and remand with directions.

The restitution question in this case arose in the context of a charge of trafficking in stolen property, i.e., a man’s custom-made ring and a man’s gold link chain bracelet. The jewelry was taken when a moving company moved the victims’ property from one residence to another. When the victims reported the theft, they advised police that they…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MartinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Scott v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API