Legal Opinion

Hernandez v. AFSCME California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 20, 2019No. 2:18-cv-02419Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 LILIANA HERNANDEZ, MIRANDA No. 2:18-CV-02419 WBS EFB ALEXANDER, NATASHA JOFFE, MARIA 13 ISABEL HOLTROP, MARCO FEKRAT, EMIN GHARIBIAN, ROHIT SHARMA, 14 HECTOR ARROYO, and TIMOTHY MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: PORTER, on behalf of themselves DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 15 and others similarly situated, SUMMARY JUDGMENT 16 Plaintiffs, 17 v. 18 AFSCME CALIFORNIA; AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY, AND 19 MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES; AFSCME LOCAL 3299, AFSCME LOCAL 2620, 20 and AFSCME LOCAL 3634, as individual…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Laurie Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Hallinan v. Fraternal Order of Police of Chicago Lodge No. 7Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Janus v. State, County, and Municipal EmployeesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API