People v. Sadler
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
A hearing panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee unanimously recommended that the respondent in this attorney disciplinary proceeding be publicly censured for neglecting legal matters entrusted to him and for failing to promptly pay to his clients funds they were entitled to. Neither the respondent nor the assistant disciplinary counsel excepted to this recommendation. We accept the recommendation of the hearing panel and order that the respondent be publicly censured and pay the costs of these proceedings.
I
The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court on October 21, 1976, is…
2Cited by2 opinions
- People v. MillsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- People v. KerwinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993