Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Tennessee Valley Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 29, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-3483PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
The Court has before it the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and their memoranda of points and authorities in opposition thereto. Plaintiff is seeking the disclosure of fourteen documents under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 (“FOIA”), eight of which have been withheld in full and six of which have been partially withheld. Defendant bases its refusal to disclose the documents on Exemption 5, which protects “inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums [sic] or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Environmental Protection Agency v. MinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coastal States Gas Corporation v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glenn Hedden v. Kean UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Kalmin v. Department of the NavyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
- Hubka v. Pennfield TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- Badhwar v. United States Department of Air ForceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.