Legal Opinion
Maldonado v. Flynn
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 30, 1979No. 77 Civil 3180PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
The instant motions, one by the individual defendants to strike the jury demand in plaintiff’s Amended and Supplemental Complaint (the “amended complaint”) and one by the corporate defendant, Zapata Corporation (“Zapata”) to strike pretrial discovery and production notices, are sequels to this Court’s opinion dismissing plaintiff’s original complaint, 1 and the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming in part and reversing in part that decision. 2
The facts and allegations underlying this action are fully set out in those earlier opinions and need not…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- J. I. Case Co. v. BorakSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,351 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Commonwealth Chemical Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,512 Marvyn Gould, of the Estate of J. Donald Rogasner, in No. 75-1338. v. American-Hawaiian Steamship Company, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,342 William Dasho v. The Susquehanna CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,484 John F. Maher v. Zapata Corporation v. William Maldonado, Objector-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Maldonado v. FlynnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- In Re Irving L. GARTENBERG, PetitionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Maldonado v. FlynnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Krinsk v. Fund Asset Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.