Boykin v. American Marine Products, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Claimant urges the deputy erred by denying all temporary benefits. Although the reason in the order for denying such benefits may at first appear erroneous as a matter of law, the deputy clearly indicates in the transcript that he denied temporary benefits because claimant’s condition did not result in a loss of wage earning capacity. In turn, this determination is supported by competent substantial evidence.
The issues raised on cross appeal are without merit except for Point III which needs clarification. The employer and carrier challenge the payment of medical bills, including a hospital…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Barris v. Toppers of Florida, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nealy v. City of West Palm BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Perry v. Ridgecrest InternationalDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Prince v. PRINCE INS. SERVICESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990