Industrial Commission v. Borset

*585OPINION

By HORNBECK, J.

The error claimed is that there is no proof that the death of plaintiff’s decedent was caused by accidental injury, and that the court should have sustained the motions of defendant for directed verdict at the close of the plaintiff’s case and at the conclusion of the entire case.

It is urged by counsel for the defendant that the verdict and judgment, can only be supported by predicating one inference of fact upon another inference of fact, in contravention of the second proposition of the syllabus in Sobolovitz v Rubric Oil Co., 107 Oh St 204, which provides:

“An…