Legal Opinion

Goebel v. Foster

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Circuit Court. cited : The State to use v. Stephenson, 12 Mo. 182 ; Morton, v. Hatch, 54 Mo. 411; Lewis v. Williams, 54 Mo. 200; Townsend v. Townsend, 60 Mo. 246 ; Bushel v. Lewis, 6 Mo. App. 599 ; Polk’s Heirs v. Sehulenburg, 4 Mo. App. 592. cited : Grayson v. Weddle, 63 Mo. 539 ; Wilkerson v. Allen, 67 Mo. 509.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayden, J.,

delivered the. opinion of the court.

One question only need be considered in this case. The. defendant introduced in evidence a certified copy of the final settlement and discharge made at the March term, 1877, of the St. Louis Probate' Court, of the plaintiff as administratrix of the estate on behalf of which this suit was brought. It appears that the suit was brought on May 25, 1877, and more than two months after the date of such final settlement and discharge. It seems that, through mistake or oversight, the demand here sued on, which was for meats furnished by the intestate to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Grayson v. WeddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Rugle v. WebsterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Morton v. HatchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Garner v. TuckerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. State ex rel. Collins v. StephensonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ewing v. ParrishMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. State ex rel. Gibson v. MyersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API