Legal Opinion

Creech v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1923No. 14579Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworti-i, J.

“The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence. The facts proved did not exclude every other reasonable 'hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the judge erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.” Harris v. State, 28 Ga. App. 24-1 (111 S. E. 214). Penal Code, § 1010.

Judgment reversed.

2ConcurrenceLuke, J.

Broyles, G. J., dissents.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922