Legal Opinion

Yatsuyanagi v. Shimamura

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1910No. 8532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered December 7, 1909, denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

This action was commenced by M. Yatsuyanagi, A. Takatsu, and N. Fukuda, plaintiffs, against S. Shimamura, defendant, to obtain the dissolution of an alleged partnership, and recover $1,000 liquidated damages. After a trial, and on the record hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiffs have appealed.

The appellants base their claim for liquidated damages on an alleged contract of partnership between themselves and respondent, executed on June SO, 1908. In their brief they state that findings of fact were made and entered by the trial judge, but we find no such findings in the record, nor…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Lambert Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Gilliland v. German-American State BankWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Borell v. CarsonWashington Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API