Legal Opinion

Clarke v. Clarke

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1983No. 83-CA-434Published

1Opinion of the Court

BOWES, Judge.

Defendant, Robert Nolan Clarke, appeals a judgment of the district court denying his motion to reduce alimony pendente lite. We affirm.

Appellant contends that the trial court was manifestly erroneous in denying his motion because the testimony at trial clearly showed a change in circumstances in the income of appellee between the time the original support payment was agreed upon and the time appellant’s motion to reduce was filed.

Plaintiff, Barbara Anglim Clarke, filed for separation from bed and board on October 13, 1982. Plaintiff and defendant entered into a consent judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lynch v. LynchLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  2. Desormeaux v. BrignacLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Peraino v. PerainoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API