City of San Antonio v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
COLLINGS, Justice.
This is a condemnation suit. It is stipulated that the condemnation proceedings instituted by the City of San Antonio were-in all things proper and legal. The question in controversy before the trial court was-the amount of damages to which defendants. Oscar Anderson and wife, Fidelia C. Anderson, were entitled for the taking of their property. The trial was before a jury and judgment was entered for the Andersons-on the basis of the verdict. The City of San Antonio has appealed.
Appellant presents two points of error-in which it is urged (1) that the court “erred in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McElyea v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Fort Worth v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
- Brown v. TorreyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- Vilbig v. FaisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
3Cited by6 opinions
- Downing v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Reynolds v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Senn v. StrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
- Bogle v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Smith v. Sun-Belt Aviation, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.