Legal Opinion

City of San Antonio v. Anderson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1961No. 3571PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINGS, Justice.

This is a condemnation suit. It is stipulated that the condemnation proceedings instituted by the City of San Antonio were-in all things proper and legal. The question in controversy before the trial court was-the amount of damages to which defendants. Oscar Anderson and wife, Fidelia C. Anderson, were entitled for the taking of their property. The trial was before a jury and judgment was entered for the Andersons-on the basis of the verdict. The City of San Antonio has appealed.

Appellant presents two points of error-in which it is urged (1) that the court “erred in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McElyea v. ParkerTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Fort Worth v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Brown v. TorreyTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Vilbig v. FaisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Downing v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  2. Reynolds v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Senn v. StrangeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Bogle v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Smith v. Sun-Belt Aviation, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API