Legal Opinion

Savings Bank of Utica v. 561-575 Delaware Avenue, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly concluded that plaintiffs motion for a deficiency judgment was not timely under RPAPL 1371. RPAPL 1371 (2) provides that a party moving for a deficiency judgment must make the motion "within ninety days after the date of the consummation of the sale by the delivery of the proper deed of conveyance to the purchaser”. Local counsel for plaintiff conceded that he received the deed on February 12, 1992; the deed was not filed until May 28, 1992. Plaintiff’s contention that the deed delivered on February 12 was not a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bianco v. ColesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. Crossland Savings, FSB v. PattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cicero v. Aspen Hills II, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Geddes Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. FerranteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Lennar Northeast Partners Ltd. Partnership v. GifaldiNew York Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API