Krauz v. Agnew
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Lee A.. Agnew, from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 26th day of Hay, 1902, upon the decision of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, sustaining the plaintiff’s demurrer to the separate defense set up in the second division of defendant’s amended answer.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, J.:
The complaint alleges that in and about the month of November, 1901, the plaintiff and the defendant entered into an agreement whereby the defendant employed the plaintiff to perform certain work, labor and services for .him in procuring one Charles H. Unverzagt to become interested as a promoter in the formation of a corporation, and for such work, labor and services the defendant promised and agreed to pay the plaintiff the sum of $5,000. The answer denies each and every allegation of the complaint, and for a further and separate defense alleges upon information and belief “…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Douglass v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Clark v. . DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Coatsworth v. Lehigh Valley Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Staten Island Midland Railroad v. HinchliffeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Smith v. . CoeNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dunne v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Blumenfeld v. StineNew York Supreme Court · 1904
- Mulinos v. WalkofAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
- Fay v. MoehlenpahNew York Supreme Court · 1930