Barsan v. Trinity Fin. Servs., LLC
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See § 673.3081(1), Fla. Stat. (2016) ; Bennett v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 124 So.3d 320, 322 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013) (noting that the term "presumed" in section 673.3081(1) means that until some evidence is introduced which would support a finding that the signature is forged or unauthorized, the plaintiff was not required to prove that it is valid (citing UCC comment 1 to section 673.3081), and because defendants failed to make any evidentiary showing to support their claim that the signer was unauthorized, plaintiff was entitled to rely on the presumption to obtain summary final…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Applegate v. Barnett Bank of TallahasseeSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Bennett v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
3Cited by4 opinions
- AZRAN MIAMI 2 LLC v. US BANK TRUST, N.A., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- EMAD SELIM v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- Evelyn Martinez v. Selene Finance LPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
- PIERRE MICHEL SMITH v. LYDIE LADOUCEUR SMITHDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021