Renee B. Hendrix v. Department of Stores National Bank
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The cardholder appeals from a final judgment entered after a judicial default. She argues that the judgment is void because she was denied the opportunity to be heard on the bank’s underlying motion for judicial default in contravention of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.500(b). We agree that rule 1.500(b) requires an opportunity to be heard under the facts of this case and reverse.
Facts
After the bank filed its complaint, the cardholder filed a pro se letter and a motion to dismiss. The circuit court denied the motion to dismiss and ordered the cardholder to answer the complaint within…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Picchi v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, NASupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Zeigler v. HustonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Mullne v. Sea-Tech Construction, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Fierro v. LewisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- International Energy Corp. v. HackettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MERLANDE RICHARD and ELIE RICHARD v. BANK OF AMERICADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- AMY FARIELLO HANSEN and DONALD F. HANSEN v. MDLV, LLC d/b/a ONE SOTHEBY'S INTERNATIONAL REALTY and THOMAS BOOTHEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- GIGI CRUZ v. THE VINYARDS OF PLANTATION CONDO. ETC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- InClaim, LLC v. Structural Wrap, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Primecare Network, Inc. v. Payroll LLC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.