Legal Opinion

Gabriel Theiss v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 7, 2015No. 4D14-3163Published

1Per curiam

Gabriel Theiss appeals the trial court’s order summarily denying his rule 3.800(a) motion challenging the legality of his life sentence for burglary with assault or battery under the Prison Releasee Reoffender statute. § 775.082(9)(a)l.o., Fla. Stat. (Supp.1998). The motion was legally sufficient under Suffield v. State, 132 So.3d 333 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014), and the case law cited therein. The trial court improperly denied the legally sufficient motion with no explanation and without ordering a state response. See Charles v. State, 100 So.3d 1272 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012); Shea v. State, 97 So.3d 861…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. Shea v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Suffield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Charles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API