Legal Opinion

Thiel v. Southern Pac. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff and petitioner seeks our order to permit him to manage his appeal and make the necessary filings without the payment of costs. The Southern Pacific Company opposes. Petitioner is a man without legs. He is employed and to go to and from the place of employment he requires the use of an old automobile, which he owns. He is heavily in debt for his medical expenses. His earnings, plus the sales value of the automobile, could not warrant a saving of the payment of the reasonably estimated costs of appeal before many months have elapsed. In our opinion he is a person who “because of his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Smith v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Barry v. BrowerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  2. Barry v. BrowerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  3. Perry v. Chief of Police of City of Marianna, Ark.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1987
  4. Government of the Virgin Islands v. RobertsMunicipal Court of The Virgin Islands · 1969
  5. Sloatman v. GibbonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API