Legal Opinion

Brown v. Jones

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 15, 1838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR to Venango county. William T. Jones against Hiram L. Brown. Appeal from the judgment of a justice. The cause was referred to arbitrators, who reported in favour of the plaintiff for 11 dollars 50 cents. The plaintiff appealed on the 19th of April 1837, and paid all costs except the attorney’s fee and costs which accrued before the justice. February term 1838 defendant pleaded to issue.

Read the full summary

ERROR to Venango county. William T. Jones against Hiram L. Brown. Appeal from the judgment of a justice. The cause was referred to arbitrators, who reported in favour of the plaintiff for 11 dollars 50 cents. The plaintiff appealed on the 19th of April 1837, and paid all costs except the attorney’s fee and costs which accrued before the justice. February term 1838 defendant pleaded to issue. On the 27th of March 1838 motion to quash for the non payment of the costs, which was denied by the court; and the same day tried, and verdict for plaintiff for 51 dollars. The error assigned was, that…

1Per curiam

After a plea, the motion to quash was too late. The appellee might dispense with payment of costs; and he did dispense with it, by omitting to move at the first opportunity, and before he had taken any other step in the cause.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wetter v. KileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API