Hinson v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceBeasley, Judge
I concur fully in Divisions 2, 3, and 4 of the majority opinion but not with the application of controlling principles in Division 1. The reversal of the judgment is also required because of the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress, which Hinson justifiably enumerates as error.
“Although we construe the evidence most favorably to upholding the trial court’s findings and judgment, this court’s responsibility in reviewing the trial court’s decision on a motion to suppress is to ensure that there was a substantial basis for the decision.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Raulerson…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tarwid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Raulerson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- State v. JarrellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.