Allerton v. Allerton
New York Supreme Court
Motion to confirm report of referee in action to annul marriage.
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
The defendants were married after having obtained a certificate from the city clerk upon representations that they were of the age of legal consent when in fact the defendant Mabel Dean Allerton was of the age of legal consent but the defendant Robert M. Allerton was not of that age. The age of legal consent is eighteen years but the age under which the consent of parents and guardians is' required is eighteen years for a woman and twenty-one for a man. Dom. Rel. Law, § 15. As the statute stood prior to *6281916 parties who contracted a marriage when they were under eighteen years of age, or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fisk v. FiskAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Kruger v. KrugerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Greenberg v. GreenbergNew York Supreme Court · 1916
- Reid v. ReidNew York Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilson v. BurnettNew York Supreme Court · 1918
- Magee v. NealonNew York Supreme Court · 1919
- Kuykendall v. KuykendallNew York Supreme Court · 1920
- Marone v. MaroneNew York Supreme Court · 1918
- Short v. HotalingNew York Supreme Court · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.