Legal Opinion

Rosecrans v. Robert Reiner, Inc.

New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau

Decided July 1, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*770# :¡í # #

The facts in this case were stipulated and agreed upon, which briefly are as follows:

Dr. James H. Eosecrans, petitioner, was engaged by respondent Eobert Eeiner, Inc., to treat medically one Eichard Spoerl, who suffered an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. Dr. Eosecrans rendered services and demanded from respondent payment of his bill, which amounted to $710. The respondent insurance'carrier, fidelity and Casualty Company, was aware of the fact that petitioner was treating said Eichard Spoerl. Petitioner not being paid his bill for medical services,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dias v. New Jersey Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  2. Moore v. DereesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stafford v. Pabco Products, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API