Legal Opinion

Arnold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 9, 1994No. 93-0015PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEVENSON, Judge.

We reverse appellant’s sentence in case no. 92-7417 because he was not furnished written notice of the state’s intent to seek enhanced penalties against him pursuant to the habitual offender statute prior to entry of his pleas of guilty. Ashley v. State, 614 So.2d 486 (Fla.1993). The appellee relies on Mansfield v. State, 618 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993), as authority for its contention that the failure to provide written notice may be harmless error. Mansfield is distinguishable from this case, however, because there the defendant signed a written plea agreement in which he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  2. Herrington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  3. Mansfield v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Dacosta v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Arnold v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API