Bingham v. New York City Transit Authority
New York Court of Appeals
POINTS OF COUNSEL
1DissentGraffeo, J.
Based on the jury verdict, there is no question that plaintiff’s injuries arose from a hazardous condition on a stairway. The question here is whether the Transit Authority, as a common carrier, is responsible for plaintiffs damages even though it did not own, occupy or control the defective premises. This inquiry turns on whether this Court should adopt a rule, developed by the Appellate Term in 1906 in Schlessinger v Manhattan Ry. Co. (49 Misc 504 [App Term 1906]), that would hold the Transit Authority liable for injuries on property that is owned, maintained, and controlled by others, but…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Basso v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Espinal v. Melville Snow Contractors, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Church v. Callanan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lewis v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.