Legal Opinion

Ana Cardella v. Jefferson Sessions

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 1, 2017No. 14-71834Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

Ana Daysi Cardella, a citizen of El Salvador, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“U”) dismissal of her application for adjustment of status for lack of jurisdiction. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Because an agency’s determination' of its jurisdiction is a question of law, we review de novo. See Reynoso-Cisneros v. Gonzales, 491 F.3d 1001, 1002 (9th Cir. 2007). For the reasons that follow, we deny Cardella’s petition for review.

1. 8 C.F.R. § 245.2(a)(1) provides that United States Citizenship and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scheerer v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Maria Dolores Reynoso-Cisneros v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. Sofokli Gazeli v. Jefferson B. Sessions, IIICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API