Watson Bros. Transportation Co. v. Domenico
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hays
This is an action to recover for damages to a truckload of eggplant allegedly caused by overheating in transit. The parties are here in reverse order of their appearance in the trial court and' we will hereinafter refer to them as plaintiff and defendant. The case was tried to the court without a jury and judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant asks for reversal of the judgment upon five separate grounds. Our disposition of the case renders it unnecessary to separately pass upon the points raised. It is sufficient to say that defendant contends that the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Merchants' Dispatch & Trans. Co. v. CornforthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1877
- Union Pacific Railroad v. StupeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Denver & Rio Grande Railroad v. A. Peterson Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1915
- Fort v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
- The PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Feinberg Kosher Sausage Co. v. Watson Bros. Transp. Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
- Arizona Container Corp. v. Consolidated FreightwaysCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Secretary of Agriculture v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956