Legal Opinion

Ghailani v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 31, 2020No. 1:16-cv-04444Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK eg-s-s= we ewe ee Me Be Ke ew eee ee ee ee ee ee Ke ee eee ee = xX AHMED KHALFAN GHAILANI, Movant, —against— 98-cr-1023 (LAK) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Respondent ew ee ee ew Bw Be eB eee eee ee ee ee eee eer eee He - - XK ORDER LEwIs A. KAPLAN, District Judge. This matter is before the Court jon defendant’s (Pro Se) Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4)(6) & (d)(3) In Further Conjunction with Recent Supreme Court Decision in Davis (June 24, 2016) (DI 2148') (“Motion No. 1"), and his (Pro Se) Motion for an Sixty (60) Days Extension of Time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. United States v. GhailaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. GhailaniDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API