Rogers v. Flournoy
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Refugio. Tried below before Hon. James O. Wilson.
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Chief Justice.
Prior to August 14, 1897, Thomas Mc-Guill and Martin McGuill were equal partners engaged in a mercantile and ginning business under the firm name of Thus. McGuill & Son. On the date mentioned Thomas McGuill died. At the death of Thomas Mc-Guill the partnership owed a number of debts, one of which was tto the appellant, C. P. Rogers. With the consent and approval of the widow and heirs of Thomas McGuill, Martin McGuill remained in charge of and Continued the conduct of the business of the late firm of Thos. McGuill &■ Son until December 9, 1897, when letters of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Williams v. . WhedonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Emerson v. SenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wiggins v. BlackshearTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Donoho v. Fish Bros. & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1882
- Durant v. . PiersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amarillo Nat. Bank v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
- Altgelt, Administrator v. National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Goldman v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929
- In re the Estate of SauerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1915
- In re F. Dobert & SonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.