Legal Opinion

Wright v. Wright

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1917No. Appeal, No. 373PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 373, Oct. T., 1915, by Fairmount Savings Trust Co., Garnishee, from order of C. P. No. 2, Philadelphia Co., Sept. T., 1912, No. 12, refusing motion to quash writ of foreign attachment in case of Elizabeth T. Wright v. George Wright. Motion to quash writ of foreign attachment. Before Barratt, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was order refusing motion to quash writ of foreign attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Trexler, J.,

A writ of foreign attachment, June 21, 1912, was directed against ten shares of the capital stock of the Pennsylvania Railroad Co., assigned by the defendant, a nonresident, to the garnishee as collateral security for a certain loan made by the garnishee to the defendant. The matter proceeded in regular course. There was a statement of claim and an answer, followed by interrogatories' and answers.

On May 19, 1914, almost two years after the writ was issued the garnishee moved to quash'the writ, the sole reason given being that the plaintiff did not file at the time of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willoughby v. BarrettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fritsch v. Buckman, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API