Legal Opinion
Hammond v. King
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 18, 1936No. 25142PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
1. A judgment for the plaintiff in an action for trover, although it is a money judgment and not a judgment for the property, is not dischargeable in bankruptcy. Berry v. Jackson, 115 Ga. 196 (41 S. E. 698, 90 Am. St. R. 102) ; Citizens Bank v. Mullis, 161 Ga. 371 (131 S. E. 44); Lester v. Southern Security Co., 168 Ga. 307 (147 S. E. 529) ; Van Pelt v. Family Loan Society, 179 Ga. 787 (177 S. E. 595); Barnes v. Moseley, 41 Ga. App. 713 (154 S. E. 388). The judgment is not a liability which, as provided in section 17 of the bankruptcy act, is dis-chargeable in bankruptcy. See Covington v.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. Aetna Acceptance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Berry v. JacksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Covington v. RosenbuschSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
- Citizens Bank v. MullisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Walker Bros. v. Capital City Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crystal Laundry & Cleaners, Inc. v. Continental Finance & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Hobbs v. Franklin Jewelry Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Huff v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- RICH'S, INCORPORATED v. MontagueCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Crystal Laundry & Cleaners, Inc. v. Continental Finance & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958