Legal Opinion
Kahn v. Royal Banks of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1990No. 57032PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SATZ, Presiding Judge.
This case concerns liabilities arising from two promissory notes executed in April, 1987 and made payable to the Royal Banks of Missouri (Bank). The trial court found Mrs. Linda Kahn (wife) and Mr. Farrell Kahn (husband) jointly liable on the notes and awarded the Bank the full amount of an injunction bond which the wife had posted as security for a temporary restraining order issued against the Bank. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
We review this court tried case under the well known principles established by Murphy v. Carrón, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976) and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Brannaker v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- City National Bank & Trust Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
- Barton v. SnellsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Hamilton Hauling, Inc. v. GAF Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Buttress v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Burney v. McLaughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Kratky v. MusilMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Landmark Bank of St. Charles County v. SaetteleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
- Coleberd v. ColeberdMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.