Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 11, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs’ argument that defendants’ appeal is defective because it relies heavily upon the complaint which was not submitted on the motion and is dehors the record, is unavailing. This Court may take judicial notice of the complaint in the case file (cf. Walker v City of New York, 46 AD3d 278, 282 [1st Dept 2007]; see Matter of Magid v Gabel, 25 AD2d 649 [1st Dept 1966]).

The trial court exercised its discretion in a provident manner in this discovery dispute. The court properly allowed defendants *540limited discovery as to a prior injury Lawrence Bennett suffered which damaged his right…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Walker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Perrotte v. Eli Lilly & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Magid v. GabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Premium Laundry Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Jerez v. 2141, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Jerez v. 2141, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Brito v. GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API