Chauvin v. Keniry
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Monserrate, J.), entered December 16, 1993 in Saratoga County, upon a decision of the court in favor of plaintiff.
On this appeal, plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in striking his demand for a jury trial. We agree. In determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial, the relevant inquiry is whether the overall nature and character of the action is equitable or legal in nature (see, e.g., Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v Spinale, 177 AD2d 315, 316; Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp., 136 AD2d 229, 232). Our review of the record…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v. SpinaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Azoulay v. CassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Abrams v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Moser v. Devine Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Chauvin v. KeniryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004