Legal Opinion

Chauvin v. Keniry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 22, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrew Iii, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Monserrate, J.), entered December 16, 1993 in Saratoga County, upon a decision of the court in favor of plaintiff.

On this appeal, plaintiff contends that Supreme Court erred in striking his demand for a jury trial. We agree. In determining whether a plaintiff is entitled to a jury trial, the relevant inquiry is whether the overall nature and character of the action is equitable or legal in nature (see, e.g., Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v Spinale, 177 AD2d 315, 316; Murphy v American Home Prods. Corp., 136 AD2d 229, 232). Our review of the record…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft v. SpinaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Azoulay v. CassinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  4. Abrams v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moser v. Devine Real Estate, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Chauvin v. KeniryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API