Legal Opinion

Central Platte Natural Resources District v. City of Fremont

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1996No. S-95-629PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

I. STATEMENT OF CASE

Following an evidential hearing, the director of the Department of Water Resources denied each of the seven applications presented by the applicant-appellant, Central Platte Natural Resources District, for permits allowing it to divert certain waters in order to develop its Prairie Bend II project, as described in part III hereinafter. The district assigns six errors to the director, which may be summarized *254as claiming (1) that the director’s order of denial is contrary to and not supported by competent and relevant evidence and is therefore arbitrary, capricious, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Application A-16642Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Central Platte Natural Resources District v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Upper Big Blue Natural Resources District v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Upper Big Blue Natural Resources District v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Little Blue Natural Resources District v. Lower Platte North Natural Resources DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. PONDEROSA RIDGE LLV v. Banner CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Southeast Rural Volunteer Fire Department v. Nebraska Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Pittman v. Sarpy County Board of EqualizationNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Douglas County v. ArchieNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Arcadian Fertilizer, L.P. v. Sarpy County Board of EqualizationNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API