Legal Opinion

Clayton Banking Co. v. Green

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 9, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

Was there a valid increase of bid under tbe circumstances set forth in tbe facts found by tbe trial judge?

Tbe correct answer to the question of law presented involves a construction of C. S., 2591. This section has been construed in many decisions of this Court, notably Wise v. Short, 181 N. C., 320, 107 S. E., 134; In re Sermon's Land, 182 N. C., 122, 108 S. E., 497; Pringle v. Loan Association, 182 N. C., 316, 108 S. E., 914; In re Ware, 187 N. C., 693, 122 S. E., 660; Trust Co. v. Powell, 189 N. C., 372, 122 S. E., 660; Briggs v. Developers, 191 N. C., 784, 133 S. E., 3; Newly v. Gallop,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lynch v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Cherry v. . GilliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Lawrence v. . BeckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Pringle v. Winston-Salem Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Wise v. . ShortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Turner v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975
  2. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barrington & Jones Law Firm, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Harris v. American Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA INC. v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Turner v. BlackburnDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API