Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Louisville & Eastern R. R.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 13, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Oldham Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

Reversing.

The appellee is a corporation created under the laws of the State of Kentucky, and operates an interurban electric railroad more than ten miles in length. It was indicted for unlawfully failing to sound a steam whistle or ring a bell at a distance of fifty rods from a place where its road crosses a highway. The indictment was found under section 786, of the Kentucky Statutes, relating to “Railroads,” which provides as follows:

“Every company shall provide each locomotive engine passing upon its road with a hell of ordinary size, and steam whistle,…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stem v. Nashville Interurban Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Shortino v. Salt Lake & U. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Sellers v. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Commonwealth v. PrallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. DixonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API