Legal Opinion

Stout v. Universal Underwriters Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1983No. 1088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

The primary issue before us in this appeal is whether certain provisions of the Motor Vehicle Safety Responsibili ty law, 1 (hereinafter, financial responsibility law) in effect at the time the instant suit was commenced, applied to all policies of insurance issued in the Commonwealth. We have concluded that the Act governed only those policies submitted to the Secretary of Revenue as proof of financial responsibility and that its provisions are therefore not applicable to this case. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

Appellants commenced this action to recover damages for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Esmond v. LISCIOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Parks v. ParksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Burne v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Mary Bakke, Johnny Bakke, Jo Lynn Wood, Karla Vigil and Lawrence VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Monti v. Rockwood InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API