Legal Opinion

In re: Anthony Johnson

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided January 20, 2016No. 16-10011PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge:

Anthony Johnson has filed a pro se ap-. plication for authorization to file a second or successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal sentence. We can authorize such a filing only if we certify that the second or successive motion is based on either:(1) newly discovered evidence that, if proven and viewed in light of the evidence as a whole, would be sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence that no reasonable factfinder would have found the movant guilty of the offense; or(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Rhines v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re: Wayne AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  2. In Re: Wayne AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  3. In re LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  4. In re: Charles Therion ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  5. In re: Charles Therion ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API