Legal Opinion

Lemmons v. Tranbraw

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided November 23, 1976No. CIV-2-76-153Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This is a pro se civil action for money damages “ * * * authorized [b]y 42 U.S.C. [§] 1983. * * * ” The complaint alleges the Court’s jurisdiction under 28 *498U.S.C. § 1343, presumably subsection (3), and also seeks declaratory relief under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202.*

The gravamen of the plaintiff’s claim is that the defendant, claimed to be a “bondsman,” was guilty of “ * * * mere negligence * * * ” in refusing to “re-sign” the plaintiff’s bond for his release on a state criminal charge after the plaintiff had failed to appear in a state court ^n…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Regina Lee Azar v. James R. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API