Legal Opinion

Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1994No. 94-297PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

| iLABOBDE, Judge.

Appellant, having failed to admit to having previously sustained back injury, today complains of an adverse ruling by the hearing officer that found his failure to disclose previous injuries constituted grounds for forfeiture under LSA-R.S. 23:1208. We reverse. LSA-R.S. 23:1208 is intended for the defense of claims arising from fabricated work-related injuries, not to bar claims based on an employee’s failure to answer truthfully an employer’s inquiries into a worker’s previous injuries. Because defendant did not comply with the prerequisites set forth in LSA-R.S. 23:1208.1,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peveto v. WHC ContractorsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. Donaldson v. UNIVERSAL ENGINEERING, OF MAPLEWOOD, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Coleman v. Sheraton PierremontLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Pickett v. Stine Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Resweber v. Haroil Const. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Mayo v. CASCO Const. Co., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Resweber v. Haroil Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API